What is the main argument against bipedal development as an adaptation for life on the savannas?
A) there is evidence there were few savannas, but more woodland and open country
B) there is no evidence that the behavior was adaptive
C) bipedalism actually caused more problems than they solved
D) most primates are bipedal, so it is not a special adaptive behavior

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The main argument against bipedal development as an adaptation for life on the savannas is that there is evidence suggesting that early hominins lived in environments with more woodland and open country rather than vast savannas.

What Is the Main Argument Against Bipedal Development as an Adaptation