In accordance with the Supreme Court of Canada's ruling in Crocker v.Sundance Northwest Resorts Ltd.,[1988] 1 S.C.R.1186,in Canada sliding down a hill in an oversized inner tube can NOT be viewed as constituting which of the following?
A) a failed defence of volenti non fit injuria
B) an assumption of known physical risks
C) a waiver of legal rights
D) a consent to legal risk
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q29: Why is the defence of volenti non
Q30: What is a distinguishing feature of European
Q31: Hector didn't read the waiver clause in
Q32: If a court finds Rudy's spinal injuries
Q33: In which aspect of negligent misstatement does
Q35: What is a distinguishing characteristic of the
Q36: Who would the law consider to be
Q37: Marsha was permanently disabled by a drunk
Q38: In the court's view,the law requires employees
Q39: Which of the following is synonymous in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents