Even though the amount of accumulated interest awarded previously by the trial judge was reduced,management of Renna Inc.indicated to its lawyer that it was pleased with the result of her efforts on the company's behalf.Which of the following would Renna Inc.'s lawyer have most likely stated as an explanation of the decision rendered by the appeal court?
A) The appeal court confirmed the original decision due to the trial judge's understanding and application of the law.
B) The appeal court varied the original decision due to the trial judge's misunderstanding and application of the law.
C) The appeal court reversed the original decision based on rehearing arguments of the facts cited by the trial judge.
D) The appeal court quashed the original decision based on rehearing arguments of the facts cited by the trial judge.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The appeal court varied the original decision, indicating a change rather than a complete overturn or confirmation of the trial judge's decision. This variation, specifically the reduction in awarded interest, suggests the appeal court found some issues with the trial judge's understanding or application of the law but did not find it necessary to completely reverse or quash the original decision.

Even Though the Amount of Accumulated Interest Awarded Previously by the Trial