In what way did the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in London Drugs Ltd v.Kuehne and Nagel International Ltd.[1992] 3 SCR 299 impact the law of privity?
A) by extending the situations in which privity prevents the enforcement of contracts by non-parties
B) by preventing the enforcement of force majeure clauses in the absence of privity
C) by holding that exclusion clauses negotiated by employers also protect employees from liability
D) by creating an insurance exception to the doctrine of privity

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court of Canada's decision in London Drugs Ltd v. Kuehne and Nagel International Ltd. impacted the law of privity by holding that exclusion clauses negotiated by employers can also protect employees from liability. This marked a significant development in the law of privity, allowing for certain exceptions where third parties (in this case, employees) could benefit from contract terms negotiated by others (their employers).

In What Way Did the Supreme Court of Canada's Decision