The quality control manager for NKA Inc. must decide whether to accept (alternative 1), further analyze (alternative 2), or reject (alternative 3) an incoming shipment (lot) of microchips. The historical data indicate that there is a 30 percent chance that the lot is poor quality (S₁), 50 percent chance that the lot is fair quality (S₂), and 20 percent chance that the lot is good quality (S₃). Assume the following payoff table is available. The values in the payoff table are in thousands of dollars.
What alternative action should be selected according to the expected monetary value criterion?

Question

The quality control manager for NKA Inc. must decide whether to accept (alternative 1), further analyze (alternative 2), or reject (alternative 3) an incoming shipment (lot) of microchips. The historical data indicate that there is a 30 percent chance that the lot is poor quality (S₁), 50 percent chance that the lot is fair quality (S₂), and 20 percent chance that the lot is good quality (S₃). Assume the following payoff table is available. The values in the payoff table are in thousands of dollars.

What alternative action should be selected according to the expected monetary value criterion?

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of The quality control manager for NKA Inc. must decide whether to accept (alternative 1), further analyze (alternative 2), or reject (alternative 3) an incoming shipment (lot) of microchips. The historical data indicate that there is a 30 percent chance that the lot is poor quality (S₁), 50 percent chance that the lot is fair quality (S₂), and 20 percent chance that the lot is good quality (S₃). Assume the following payoff table is available. The values in the payoff table are in thousands of dollars. What alternative action should be selected according to the expected monetary value criterion?

The Quality Control Manager for NKA Inc