When a court strikes down an unreasonable agreement between an employer and employee that restricts the future economic freedom of the employee, the court serves two public interests, namely protecting employees and
A) maintaining peaceful workplaces.
B) protecting businesses.
C) applying the law law.
D) protecting the management of businesses.
E) protect the mobility of labour.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The statement mentions the restriction of future economic freedom of the employee, which implies a limitation on the mobility of labor. Therefore, by striking down such agreements, the court protects the mobility of labor and ensures that employees are not unfairly bound to a single employer, which is in the public interest. The other options are not directly mentioned in the statement and are not as relevant to the context.

When a Court Strikes Down an Unreasonable Agreement Between an Employer