Albert has agreed to sell his car to Larry for $14 000.00.Albert told Larry that the car had never been in an accident,was in good condition,and drove like a dream.Albert knew that this was untrue,but wanted to get as much money as he could for the car.In fact,the car had been in two accidents,had substantial frame damage,and could not be driven safely on the road.Assume that Harry had no way of checking on the condition of the car and that the principle of caveat emptor does not apply.In this situation,Albert's statement about the car is
A) a negligent misrepresentation.
B) an innocent misrepresentation.
C) a fraudulent misrepresentation.
D) a mere invitation to treat.
E) none of the above
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q34: With respect to sale of goods,the doctrine
Q35: Damages are not generally awarded in cases
Q36: You innocently have made some misstatements that
Q37: The domination of one party over the
Q38: If rescission is unavailable in a case
Q40: Christi was told by the store's produce
Q41: Where a party inadvertently uses the wrong
Q42: Paul,a poor farmer,has just learned he has
Q43: Scott,an independent businessman,is asking his wife to
Q44: The most fundamental mistake that radically changes
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents