When developing an argument that progresses from a set of specific,related facts to a general conclusion,you are engaging in
A) analogical reasoning.
B) deductive reasoning.
C) inductive reasoning.
D) cause-effect reasoning.
E) reasoning by metaphor.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

When progressing from specific and related facts to a broad conclusion, one uses inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning goes from specific to general, making an inference based on observed patterns. It is not deductive reasoning, which moves from general to specific, nor is it analogical reasoning or reasoning by metaphor, which both involve making comparisons or drawing connections. Cause-effect reasoning may be a part of inductive reasoning, but the focus on specific facts to reach a general conclusion is the defining aspect of inductive reasoning.

When Developing an Argument That Progresses from a Set of Specific,related