John entered into a contract with Barb to restore Barb's antique Ford for $9,000.Because John owes his younger brother a large sum of money,John assigned,prior to notifying Barb of the assignment,his right to receive payment to his brother.John began the restoration,but quickly stopped working on the car.Because of this,Barb retrieved the car from John.Almost no restoration work had been performed.Which of the following is true in this situation?
A) As a result of the assignment, John's brother is entitled to payment despite the fact that John did not perform the restoration.
B) Because of the assignment, John's brother was responsible for John's performance.
C) John's brother does not have a right to collect the $9,000 from Barb.
D) Barb is obligated to allow John's brother to complete the restoration if he so desires.
E) John's assignment of his right to payment without Barb's consent was improper and discharged John's duties under the contract.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Since almost no restoration work had been performed, John did not have a right to receive the $9,000 from Barb, and therefore, he did not have the right to assign his right to receive payment to his brother. As a result, John's brother does not have a right to collect the $9,000 from Barb. The assignment was improper and ineffective, and John remains liable for the breach of the contract.

John Entered into a Contract with Barb to Restore Barb's