Which of the following is true of the objection of lack of standing that a state can raise against a complaint at the ICJ?
A) It can prevent private persons from directly entering into a case against a country.
B) It only applies to persons with dual citizenship.
C) It cannot be used as grounds for dismissing a case.
D) It prevents states from sponsoring private persons from bringing a case against another state.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The objection of lack of standing is often used by states to prevent private persons or non-state entities from directly bringing a case against a state. This objection is also known as the "doctrine of diplomatic protection" and is based on the idea that only states have the right to bring a case before the ICJ on behalf of their nationals or citizens. Therefore, private persons or entities may need the support or sponsorship of their home state to bring a case before the ICJ. Option B and D are incorrect, as lack of standing applies to all private persons and does not depend on citizenship or sponsorship. Option C is incorrect, as the lack of standing objection is a valid legal ground for dismissing a case if the plaintiff does not have the necessary legal interest or right to bring the case.

Which of the Following Is True of the Objection of Lack