Which of the following best sums up the difference between the rules of evidence in arbitration cases and those applied to formal court cases?
A)Standards are generally much more relaxed in arbitration cases.
B)There is no difference.
C)Standards are sometimes,but not always more relaxed in arbitration cases.
D)Standards are generally stricter in arbitration cases.
E)There is no discernible relationship.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The rules of evidence in arbitration cases are generally more relaxed than those applied to formal court cases. This is because arbitration is meant to be a quicker, less formal process than going to court, and therefore the rules are often more flexible.

Which of the Following Best Sums Up the Difference Between