Which of the following would always be considered to be contrary to public policy?
A) A contract which contains a covenant not to compete
B) A contract offered on a take-it-or-leave-it basis
C) An agreement to pay someone to make false,negative statements about a competitor's product
D) An agreement which contains an exculpatory clause

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

It is against public policy to pay someone to make false negative statements about a competitor's product, as it goes against fair competition and can harm consumers. Choices A, B, and D can be considered valid contracts depending on the specific circumstances and the jurisdiction.

Which of the Following Would Always Be Considered to Be