Why might one argue that inductive reasoning is less susceptible to bias than deductive reasoning is?
A) Inductive reasoning begins with a general theory rather than specific observations.
B) In inductive reasoning, the observations that would refute the theory are specified in advance.
C) Inductive reasoning begins with objective observations rather than a theory in the reasoner's mind.
D) Inductive reasoning is essentially the opposite of the sort of deductive reasoning that philosophers used.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Inductive reasoning begins with observations and then uses them to develop a theory or hypothesis, which makes it less susceptible to bias than deductive reasoning, which starts with a preconceived theory or hypothesis. Objective observations reduce the likelihood of subjective bias in the reasoning process.

Why Might One Argue That Inductive Reasoning Is Less Susceptible