Evidence obtained during a conversation that does not constitute the "functional equivalent" of an interrogation is admissible in court.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Evidence obtained during a conversation that is not considered the "functional equivalent" of an interrogation can be admissible in court, especially if it is voluntary and not the result of a direct or indirect questioning method designed to elicit an incriminating response.

Evidence Obtained During a Conversation That Does Not Constitute the "Functional