In which of the following cases the Court ruled that the conversation in this case was merely a dialog between police officers and did not constitute the "functional equivalent" of an interrogation.
A) Rhode Island v. Innis
B) Arizona v. Mauro
C) Nix v. Williams
D) Horton v. California

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Rhode Island v. Innis, the Supreme Court ruled that the conversation in question was merely a dialogue between police officers and did not constitute the "functional equivalent" of an interrogation. This decision was based on the interpretation that the officers' remarks were not made with the intent of eliciting an incriminating response from the suspect.

In Which of the Following Cases the Court Ruled That