Rachels' view regarding euthanasia can be described as follows:
A) Passive euthanasia is always morally preferable to active euthanasia.
B) Active euthanasia is always morally preferable to passive euthanasia.
C) Active euthanasia and passive euthanasia are both always morally wrong.
D) There is no moral difference between active and passive euthanasia.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Rachels argues that there is no moral difference between active and passive euthanasia. He believes that if the intention is to end suffering and the patient has given their informed consent, then both forms of euthanasia can be morally permissible. He further argues that in some cases, passive euthanasia can lead to a prolonged and more painful death, while active euthanasia can be a quicker and more merciful option. Therefore, Rachels believes that the focus should be on relieving suffering and respecting the autonomy of the patient rather than distinguishing between active and passive forms of euthanasia.

Rachels' View Regarding Euthanasia Can Be Described as Follows