expand icon
book Introductory Econometrics 4th Edition by Jeffrey Wooldridge cover

Introductory Econometrics 4th Edition by Jeffrey Wooldridge

Edition 4ISBN: 978-0324660609
book Introductory Econometrics 4th Edition by Jeffrey Wooldridge cover

Introductory Econometrics 4th Edition by Jeffrey Wooldridge

Edition 4ISBN: 978-0324660609
Exercise 1
Use CONSUMP.RAW for this exercise. One version of the permanent income hypothesis (PIH) of consumption is that the growth in consumption is unpredictable. [Another version is that the change in consumption itself is unpredictable; see Mankiw (1994, Chapter 15) for discussion of the PIH.] Let Use CONSUMP.RAW for this exercise. One version of the permanent income hypothesis (PIH) of consumption is that the growth in consumption is unpredictable. [Another version is that the change in consumption itself is unpredictable; see Mankiw (1994, Chapter 15) for discussion of the PIH.] Let   be the growth in real per capita consumption (of nondurables and services). Then the PIH implies that   where I t - 1 denotes information known at time ( t 1); in this case, t denotes a year. (i) Test the PIH by estimating   Clearly state the null and alternative hypotheses. What do you conclude  (ii) To the regression in part (i) add the variables gy t 1 , i 3 t 1 , and inf t 1. Are these new variables individually or jointly significant at the 5% level (Be sure to report the appropriate p -values.) (iii) In the regression from part (ii), what happens to the p -value for the t statistic on gc t 1 Does this mean the PIH hypothesis is now supported by the data  (iv) In the regression from part(ii), what is the F statistic and its associated p -value for joint significance of the four explanatory variables Does your conclusion about the PIH now agree with what you found in part (i) be the growth in real per capita consumption (of nondurables and services). Then the PIH implies that Use CONSUMP.RAW for this exercise. One version of the permanent income hypothesis (PIH) of consumption is that the growth in consumption is unpredictable. [Another version is that the change in consumption itself is unpredictable; see Mankiw (1994, Chapter 15) for discussion of the PIH.] Let   be the growth in real per capita consumption (of nondurables and services). Then the PIH implies that   where I t - 1 denotes information known at time ( t 1); in this case, t denotes a year. (i) Test the PIH by estimating   Clearly state the null and alternative hypotheses. What do you conclude  (ii) To the regression in part (i) add the variables gy t 1 , i 3 t 1 , and inf t 1. Are these new variables individually or jointly significant at the 5% level (Be sure to report the appropriate p -values.) (iii) In the regression from part (ii), what happens to the p -value for the t statistic on gc t 1 Does this mean the PIH hypothesis is now supported by the data  (iv) In the regression from part(ii), what is the F statistic and its associated p -value for joint significance of the four explanatory variables Does your conclusion about the PIH now agree with what you found in part (i) where I t - 1 denotes information known at time ( t 1); in this case, t denotes a year.
(i) Test the PIH by estimating Use CONSUMP.RAW for this exercise. One version of the permanent income hypothesis (PIH) of consumption is that the growth in consumption is unpredictable. [Another version is that the change in consumption itself is unpredictable; see Mankiw (1994, Chapter 15) for discussion of the PIH.] Let   be the growth in real per capita consumption (of nondurables and services). Then the PIH implies that   where I t - 1 denotes information known at time ( t 1); in this case, t denotes a year. (i) Test the PIH by estimating   Clearly state the null and alternative hypotheses. What do you conclude  (ii) To the regression in part (i) add the variables gy t 1 , i 3 t 1 , and inf t 1. Are these new variables individually or jointly significant at the 5% level (Be sure to report the appropriate p -values.) (iii) In the regression from part (ii), what happens to the p -value for the t statistic on gc t 1 Does this mean the PIH hypothesis is now supported by the data  (iv) In the regression from part(ii), what is the F statistic and its associated p -value for joint significance of the four explanatory variables Does your conclusion about the PIH now agree with what you found in part (i) Clearly state the null and alternative hypotheses. What do you conclude
(ii) To the regression in part (i) add the variables gy t 1 , i 3 t 1 , and inf t 1. Are these new variables individually or jointly significant at the 5% level (Be sure to report the appropriate p -values.)
(iii) In the regression from part (ii), what happens to the p -value for the t statistic on gc t 1 Does this mean the PIH hypothesis is now supported by the data
(iv) In the regression from part(ii), what is the F statistic and its associated p -value for joint significance of the four explanatory variables Does your conclusion about the PIH now agree with what you found in part (i)
Explanation
Verified
like image
like image

(i)
Estimating the regression model: blured image blured image I...

close menu
Introductory Econometrics 4th Edition by Jeffrey Wooldridge
cross icon