
Cost Management: A Strategic Emphasis 5th Edition by David Stout, Edward Blocher, Gary Cokins
Edition 5ISBN: 0073526940
Cost Management: A Strategic Emphasis 5th Edition by David Stout, Edward Blocher, Gary Cokins
Edition 5ISBN: 0073526940Activity-Based Costing Miami Valley Architects Inc. provides a wide range of engineering and architectural consulting services through its three branch offices in Columbus, Cincinnati, and Dayton, Ohio. The company allocates resources and bonuses to the three branches based on the net income of the period. The results of the firm’s performance for the year 2010 follows ($ in thousands):
| Columbus | Cincinnati | Dayton | Total |
Sales | $1,500 | $1,419 | $1,067 | $3,986 |
Less: Direct labor | 382 | 317 | 317 | 1,016 |
Direct materials | 281 | 421 | 185 | 887 |
Overhead | 710 | 589 | 589 | 1,888 |
Net income | $ 127 | $ 92 | $ (24) | $ 195 |
Miami Valley accumulates overhead items in one overhead pool and allocates it to the branches based on direct labor dollars. For 2010, this predetermined overhead rate was $1.859 for every direct labor dollar incurred by an office. The overhead pool includes rent, depreciation, and taxes, regardless of which office incurred the expense. Some branch managers complain that the overhead allocation method forces them to absorb a portion of the overhead incurred by the other offices.
Management is concerned with the 2010 operating results. During a review of overhead expenses, management noticed that many overhead items were clearly not correlated to the movement in direct labor dollars as previously assumed. Management decided that applying overhead based on activity-based costing and direct tracing wherever possible should provide a more accurate picture of the profitability of each branch.
An analysis of the overhead revealed that the following dollars for rent, utilities, depreciation, and taxes could be traced directly to the office that incurred the overhead ($ in thousands):
| Columbus | Cincinnati | Dayton | Total |
Direct overhead | $180 | $270 | $177 | $627 |
Activity pools and their corresponding cost drivers were determined from the accounting records and staff surveys as follows:
General administration | $ 409,000 |
Project costing | 48,000 |
Accounts payable/receiving | 139,000 |
Accounts receivable | 47,000 |
Payroll/Mail sort and delivery | 30,000 |
Personnel recruiting | 38,000 |
Employee insurance processing | 14,000 |
Proposals | 139,000 |
Sales meetings/Sales aids | 202,000 |
Shipping | 24,000 |
Ordering | 48,000 |
Duplicating costs | 46,000 |
Blueprinting | 77,000 |
| $1,261,000 |
| Volume of Cost Drivers by Location | ||
Cost Driver | Columbus | Cincinnati | Dayton |
Direct labor cost | $ 382,413 | 317,086 | 317,188 |
Timesheet entries | 6,000 | 3,800 | 3,500 |
Vendor invoices | 1,020 | 850 | 400 |
Client invoices | 588 | 444 | 96 |
Employees | 23 | 26 | 18 |
New hires | 8 | 4 | 7 |
Insurance claims filed | 230 | 260 | 180 |
Proposals | 200 | 250 | 60 |
Contracted sales | 1,824,439 | 1,399,617 | 571,208 |
Projects shipped | 99 | 124 | 30 |
Purchase orders | 135 | 110 | 80 |
Copies duplicated | 162,500 | 146,250 | 65,000 |
Blueprints | 39,000 | 31,200 | 16,000 |
Required (Round all answers to thousands)
1. What overhead costs should be assigned to each branch based on ABC concepts?
2. What is the contribution of each branch before subtracting the results obtained in requirement 1?
3. What is the profitability of each branch office using ABC?
4. Evaluate the concerns of management regarding the volume-based cost technique currently used.
Step 1 of 3
(“Miami Valley Architects, Inc.” by Beth M. Chaffman, and John Talbott, Management Accounting Campus Report, Fall 1992, p.4)
1.?Overhead Cost assigned to each branch under the ABC costing:
? | Columbus | Cincinnati | Dayton | Total | ? |
Direct labor dollar | 37.61% | 31.19% | 31.20% | 100% | |
Timesheet entries | 45.11 | 28.57 | 26.32 | 100 | |
Vendor invoices | 44.93 | 37.44 | 17.62 | 100 | |
Client invoices | 52.13 | 39.36 | 8.51 | 100 | |
Employees | 34.33 | 38.81 | 26.87 | 100 | |
New hires | 42.11 | 21.05 | 36.84 | 100 | |
Insurance claims filed | 34.33 | 38.81 | 26.87 | 100 | |
Proposals | 39.22 | 49.02 | 11.76 | 100 | |
Contracted sales | 48.07 | 36.88 | 15.05 | 100 | |
Projects shipped | 39.13 | 49.01 | 11.86 | 100 | |
Purchase orders | 41.54 | 33.85 | 24.62 | 100 | |
Copies duplicated | 43.48 | 39.13 | 17.39 | 100 | |
Blueprints | 45.24 | 36.19 | 18.56 | 100 |
Activity-based overhead allocation (000s) | ? | ? | ? | |||
? | Colum. | Cinci. | Dayton | Total | Cost Driver | |
General administration | $153.84 | $127.56 | $127.60 | $ 409 | Direct labor dollar | |
Project costing | 21.65 | 13.71 | 12.63 | 48 | Timesheet entries | |
Accounts payable/receiving | 62.46 | 52.05 | 24.49 | 139 | Vendor invoices | |
Accounts receivable | 24.50 | 18.50 | 4.00 | 47 | Client invoices | |
Payroll/Mail sort & delivery | 10.30 | 11.64 | 8.06 | 30 | Employees | |
Personnel recruiting | 16.00 | 8.00 | 14.00 | 38 | New hires | |
Employee insurance process. | 4.81 | 5.43 | 3.76 | 14 | Insurance claims filed | |
Proposals | 54.51 | 68.14 | 16.35 | 139 | Proposals | |
Sales meetings/Sales aids | 97.10 | 74.49 | 30.40 | 202 | Contracted sales | |
Shipping | 9.39 | 11.76 | 2.85 | 24 | Projects shipped | |
Ordering | 19.94 | 16.25 | 11.82 | 48 | Purchase orders | |
Duplicating costs | 20.00 | 18.00 | 8.00 | 46 | Copies duplicated | |
Blueprinting | 34.84 | 27.87 | 14.29 | 77 | Blueprints | |
Total | $529.34 | $453.40 | $278.25 | $1,261 | ? | ? |
Calculation for general administration allocated to branches:
Total direct labor dollar: $382,413 + $317,086 + $317,188 = $1,016,687
Allocation of general administration based on direct labor dollar:
? | Proportion | Allocated Amount |
Columbus | $382,413 / $1,016,687 = 37.61% | $409 x 37.61% = $153.84 |
Cincinnati | $317,086 / $1,016,687 = 31.19% | $409 x 31.19% = $127.56 |
Dayton | $317,188 / $1,016,687 = 31.20% | $409 x 31.20% = $127.60 |
Step 2 of 3
Step 3 of 3
Why don’t you like this exercise?
Other
