expand icon
book Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 6th Edition by Jeffrey M Wooldridge cover

Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 6th Edition by Jeffrey M Wooldridge

Edition 6ISBN: 130527010X
book Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 6th Edition by Jeffrey M Wooldridge cover

Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 6th Edition by Jeffrey M Wooldridge

Edition 6ISBN: 130527010X
Exercise 20

Use the data in WAGEPAN.RAW for this exercise.

(i) Consider the unobserved effects model

 Use the data in WAGEPAN.RAW for this exercise. <blockquote> (i) Consider the unobserved effects model   where ai is allowed to be correlated with educi and unionit. Which parameters can you estimate using first differencing? (ii) Estimate the equation from part (i) by FD, and test the null hypothesis that the return to education has not changed over time. (iii) Test the hypothesis from part (ii) using a fully robust test, that is, one that allows arbitrary heteroskedasticity and serial correlation in the FD errors, Auit. Does your conclusion change? (iv) Now allow the union differential to change over time (along with education) and estimate the equation by FD. What is the estimated union differential in 1980? What about 1987? Is the difference statistically significant? (v) Test the null hypothesis that the union differential has not changed over time, and discuss your results in light of your answer to part (iv). </blockquote>

where ai is allowed to be correlated with educi and unionit. Which parameters can you estimate using first differencing?

(ii) Estimate the equation from part (i) by FD, and test the null hypothesis that the return to education has not changed over time.

(iii) Test the hypothesis from part (ii) using a fully robust test, that is, one that allows arbitrary heteroskedasticity and serial correlation in the FD errors, Auit. Does your conclusion change?

(iv) Now allow the union differential to change over time (along with education) and estimate the equation by FD. What is the estimated union differential in 1980? What about 1987? Is the difference statistically significant?

(v) Test the null hypothesis that the union differential has not changed over time, and discuss your results in light of your answer to part (iv).

Step-by-step solution
Verified
like image
like image

Step 1 of 9

(i)

Consider the unobserved effects model given by:

    <div class=answer> (i) Consider the unobserved effects model given by:   Given that   is allowed to be correlated with   and   , the parameters that can be estimated using first difference (Cross-sectional Fixed Effects model) are those parameters that do not remain constant across individuals such as:   That means except for   , all the parameters could be estimated using first differencing

Given that     <div class=answer> (i) Consider the unobserved effects model given by:   Given that   is allowed to be correlated with   and   , the parameters that can be estimated using first difference (Cross-sectional Fixed Effects model) are those parameters that do not remain constant across individuals such as:   That means except for   , all the parameters could be estimated using first differencing is allowed to be correlated with     <div class=answer> (i) Consider the unobserved effects model given by:   Given that   is allowed to be correlated with   and   , the parameters that can be estimated using first difference (Cross-sectional Fixed Effects model) are those parameters that do not remain constant across individuals such as:   That means except for   , all the parameters could be estimated using first differencing and    <div class=answer> (i) Consider the unobserved effects model given by:   Given that   is allowed to be correlated with   and   , the parameters that can be estimated using first difference (Cross-sectional Fixed Effects model) are those parameters that do not remain constant across individuals such as:   That means except for   , all the parameters could be estimated using first differencing , the parameters that can be estimated using first difference (Cross-sectional Fixed Effects model) are those parameters that do not remain constant across individuals such as:    <div class=answer> (i) Consider the unobserved effects model given by:   Given that   is allowed to be correlated with   and   , the parameters that can be estimated using first difference (Cross-sectional Fixed Effects model) are those parameters that do not remain constant across individuals such as:   That means except for   , all the parameters could be estimated using first differencing

That means except for    <div class=answer> (i) Consider the unobserved effects model given by:   Given that   is allowed to be correlated with   and   , the parameters that can be estimated using first difference (Cross-sectional Fixed Effects model) are those parameters that do not remain constant across individuals such as:   That means except for   , all the parameters could be estimated using first differencing , all the parameters could be estimated using first differencing


Step 2 of 9


Step 3 of 9


Step 4 of 9


Step 5 of 9


Step 6 of 9


Step 7 of 9


Step 8 of 9


Step 9 of 9

close menu
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 6th Edition by Jeffrey M Wooldridge
cross icon