expand icon
book Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 6th Edition by Jeffrey M Wooldridge cover

Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 6th Edition by Jeffrey M Wooldridge

Edition 6ISBN: 130527010X
book Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 6th Edition by Jeffrey M Wooldridge cover

Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 6th Edition by Jeffrey M Wooldridge

Edition 6ISBN: 130527010X
Exercise 11

Use CRIME3.RAW for this exercise.

(i) In the model of Example, test the hypothesis H0: ?1 = ?2. (Hint: Define ?1 = ?1 – ?2 and write ?1 in terms of ?1 and ft. Substitute this into the equation and then rearrange. Do a t test on ?1.)

(ii) If ft = ft, show that the differenced equation can be written as

Alog(crimei) = ?0 + ?1?avgclri + ?ui, where ?1 = 2?1 and avgclr. = (clrprc4-1 + clrprc4-2)/2 is the average clear-up percentage over the previous two years.

(iii) Estimate the equation from part (ii). Compare the adjusted R-squared with that in (13.22). Which model would you finally use?

Step-by-step solution
Verified
like image
like image

Step 1 of 3

Consider the unobserved effects model:

    <div class=answer> Consider the unobserved effects model:   This model when expressed as the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Given   Substitute   in the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Estimating   The result is:     Testing for the significance of the hypothesis   using the Wald test which is equivalent to testing for the hypothesis   using the Wald test, the result is:     Since, the p-value corresponding to F-statistic is 0.2881 which is greater than the critical p-value of 0.05 at 5% level of significance, it is indicated that   .That means there is no statistical significant difference between   and   at 5% level of significance

This model when expressed as the first-differenced equation, the result is:

    <div class=answer> Consider the unobserved effects model:   This model when expressed as the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Given   Substitute   in the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Estimating   The result is:     Testing for the significance of the hypothesis   using the Wald test which is equivalent to testing for the hypothesis   using the Wald test, the result is:     Since, the p-value corresponding to F-statistic is 0.2881 which is greater than the critical p-value of 0.05 at 5% level of significance, it is indicated that   .That means there is no statistical significant difference between   and   at 5% level of significance

Given     <div class=answer> Consider the unobserved effects model:   This model when expressed as the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Given   Substitute   in the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Estimating   The result is:     Testing for the significance of the hypothesis   using the Wald test which is equivalent to testing for the hypothesis   using the Wald test, the result is:     Since, the p-value corresponding to F-statistic is 0.2881 which is greater than the critical p-value of 0.05 at 5% level of significance, it is indicated that   .That means there is no statistical significant difference between   and   at 5% level of significance

Substitute     <div class=answer> Consider the unobserved effects model:   This model when expressed as the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Given   Substitute   in the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Estimating   The result is:     Testing for the significance of the hypothesis   using the Wald test which is equivalent to testing for the hypothesis   using the Wald test, the result is:     Since, the p-value corresponding to F-statistic is 0.2881 which is greater than the critical p-value of 0.05 at 5% level of significance, it is indicated that   .That means there is no statistical significant difference between   and   at 5% level of significance in the first-differenced equation, the result is:

    <div class=answer> Consider the unobserved effects model:   This model when expressed as the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Given   Substitute   in the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Estimating   The result is:     Testing for the significance of the hypothesis   using the Wald test which is equivalent to testing for the hypothesis   using the Wald test, the result is:     Since, the p-value corresponding to F-statistic is 0.2881 which is greater than the critical p-value of 0.05 at 5% level of significance, it is indicated that   .That means there is no statistical significant difference between   and   at 5% level of significance

Estimating     <div class=answer> Consider the unobserved effects model:   This model when expressed as the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Given   Substitute   in the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Estimating   The result is:     Testing for the significance of the hypothesis   using the Wald test which is equivalent to testing for the hypothesis   using the Wald test, the result is:     Since, the p-value corresponding to F-statistic is 0.2881 which is greater than the critical p-value of 0.05 at 5% level of significance, it is indicated that   .That means there is no statistical significant difference between   and   at 5% level of significance

The result is:

    <div class=answer> Consider the unobserved effects model:   This model when expressed as the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Given   Substitute   in the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Estimating   The result is:     Testing for the significance of the hypothesis   using the Wald test which is equivalent to testing for the hypothesis   using the Wald test, the result is:     Since, the p-value corresponding to F-statistic is 0.2881 which is greater than the critical p-value of 0.05 at 5% level of significance, it is indicated that   .That means there is no statistical significant difference between   and   at 5% level of significance

    <div class=answer> Consider the unobserved effects model:   This model when expressed as the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Given   Substitute   in the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Estimating   The result is:     Testing for the significance of the hypothesis   using the Wald test which is equivalent to testing for the hypothesis   using the Wald test, the result is:     Since, the p-value corresponding to F-statistic is 0.2881 which is greater than the critical p-value of 0.05 at 5% level of significance, it is indicated that   .That means there is no statistical significant difference between   and   at 5% level of significance

Testing for the significance of the hypothesis     <div class=answer> Consider the unobserved effects model:   This model when expressed as the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Given   Substitute   in the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Estimating   The result is:     Testing for the significance of the hypothesis   using the Wald test which is equivalent to testing for the hypothesis   using the Wald test, the result is:     Since, the p-value corresponding to F-statistic is 0.2881 which is greater than the critical p-value of 0.05 at 5% level of significance, it is indicated that   .That means there is no statistical significant difference between   and   at 5% level of significance using the Wald test which is equivalent to testing for the hypothesis     <div class=answer> Consider the unobserved effects model:   This model when expressed as the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Given   Substitute   in the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Estimating   The result is:     Testing for the significance of the hypothesis   using the Wald test which is equivalent to testing for the hypothesis   using the Wald test, the result is:     Since, the p-value corresponding to F-statistic is 0.2881 which is greater than the critical p-value of 0.05 at 5% level of significance, it is indicated that   .That means there is no statistical significant difference between   and   at 5% level of significance using the Wald test, the result is:

    <div class=answer> Consider the unobserved effects model:   This model when expressed as the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Given   Substitute   in the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Estimating   The result is:     Testing for the significance of the hypothesis   using the Wald test which is equivalent to testing for the hypothesis   using the Wald test, the result is:     Since, the p-value corresponding to F-statistic is 0.2881 which is greater than the critical p-value of 0.05 at 5% level of significance, it is indicated that   .That means there is no statistical significant difference between   and   at 5% level of significance

    <div class=answer> Consider the unobserved effects model:   This model when expressed as the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Given   Substitute   in the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Estimating   The result is:     Testing for the significance of the hypothesis   using the Wald test which is equivalent to testing for the hypothesis   using the Wald test, the result is:     Since, the p-value corresponding to F-statistic is 0.2881 which is greater than the critical p-value of 0.05 at 5% level of significance, it is indicated that   .That means there is no statistical significant difference between   and   at 5% level of significance

Since, the p-value corresponding to F-statistic is 0.2881 which is greater than the critical p-value of 0.05 at 5% level of significance, it is indicated that     <div class=answer> Consider the unobserved effects model:   This model when expressed as the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Given   Substitute   in the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Estimating   The result is:     Testing for the significance of the hypothesis   using the Wald test which is equivalent to testing for the hypothesis   using the Wald test, the result is:     Since, the p-value corresponding to F-statistic is 0.2881 which is greater than the critical p-value of 0.05 at 5% level of significance, it is indicated that   .That means there is no statistical significant difference between   and   at 5% level of significance .That means there is no statistical significant difference between     <div class=answer> Consider the unobserved effects model:   This model when expressed as the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Given   Substitute   in the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Estimating   The result is:     Testing for the significance of the hypothesis   using the Wald test which is equivalent to testing for the hypothesis   using the Wald test, the result is:     Since, the p-value corresponding to F-statistic is 0.2881 which is greater than the critical p-value of 0.05 at 5% level of significance, it is indicated that   .That means there is no statistical significant difference between   and   at 5% level of significance and    <div class=answer> Consider the unobserved effects model:   This model when expressed as the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Given   Substitute   in the first-differenced equation, the result is:   Estimating   The result is:     Testing for the significance of the hypothesis   using the Wald test which is equivalent to testing for the hypothesis   using the Wald test, the result is:     Since, the p-value corresponding to F-statistic is 0.2881 which is greater than the critical p-value of 0.05 at 5% level of significance, it is indicated that   .That means there is no statistical significant difference between   and   at 5% level of significance at 5% level of significance


Step 2 of 3


Step 3 of 3

close menu
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 6th Edition by Jeffrey M Wooldridge
cross icon