In the case of Pittsley v. Houser, the court:
A) held that the contract should be severed into different parts, applying the UCC to the part of the contract involving goods and the common law to the services part of the contract.
B) held that the "predominant factor" test contravened the UCC's declared purpose.
C) found the "predominant factor" test was the better, more prudent rule.
D) found the CISG governed the contract in question.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court found that the "predominant factor" test was the better, more prudent rule for determining whether the UCC or common law should apply to a mixed contract involving both goods and services.

In the Case of Pittsley V