CN is the student of the W university, when is at her class campus security entered her dorm room and searched. After returning from the class she discovered what had happened and complained to senior resident and senior replied that it was the university property and CN has no right of privacy.
Right of privacy:
It is the individual legal right which have the right to secure individual from the unreasonable searches.
The fourth amendment of the US constitution guarantees this rule of right of privacy.
In this case University security entered and searched some dorm rooms without notice. The student has a right of privacy to her dorm room even if the dorm is University property.
As per the fourth amendment of the US constitution no police or security should not enter anyone's home without any notice. Here in this case the security checked the dorm rooms without any prior notice or warrant. Moreover, there is no reasonable suspicion for the search is mentioned. Hence, there is a right of privacy in a dorm room. The statement given by the senior resident is incorrect.
Company C had run an advertisement "E" during a bowling event which got the highest rating as a best ad for the game. After certain months, company A ran an Ad at an auto show which gave the feel that the ad content is similar to the content of ad E made by company C. The ad of company A became viral on internet and company C and its publisher notifies company A that the ad constitutes an unauthorized use of their intellectual property.
Company C can claim protection under copyright infringement under intellectual property rights that falls under uniform commercial code. If the ad of the company A is similar and is a copy of idea of the company C, then C can sue company A for committing copyright infringement and can claim protection. Company C can protect its intellectual idea related to the ad.
Courts can see the extent of the infringement that have been committed in the above case and can see the applicability of the law and proceed accordingly.
In this case Professor P sent an email to Professor J using work place University email system. The email chided J and J sent it to a superior. P does not have a right of privacy to the email. The email system is part of the University property and it has a business interest in reviewing email contents.