In the present scenario, the FF vs. VE, the trial court should probably find whether VE had completed the part of transaction as it is already paid as a result of partial performance.
The Statute of Frauds requires that any contract for the sale of goods priced at $500 or more must be in written form of enforceability. The fact of the case is, VE has accepted an oral partial payment for the goods promised by the company.
Hence, the part of the agreement was enforceable where VE should deliver 100 bushels of corn to FF at 1.25 per bushel.
The court should rule in favor of
There was no written contract between the ESI and SNK. Moreover, ESI's purchase order forms it faxed did not qualify as confirmations of a oral contracts. Since there was no evidence that SNK received the purchase orders that ESI claimed to have sent, any agreement between the parties was not enforceable under the UCC's Statute of Frauds.
Thus, the trial court should grant a summary judgment in favor of SNK.
The Article of the UCC manages the contracts based on the sales or it manages those contracts that are concerned with the transaction of various goods. For the facilitation of the transactions, which are for profit making purposes, Article 2 makes amendments in some of the contract requirements based on common laws. The main point of focus over here is that the Article 2 is concerned directly with the sale of the goods and it is not concerned with the real property, it doesn't deal with services or even the stocks or the bonds that are known as the intangible property. The Article 2A of the UCC manages the leases. Nowadays the leases that are concerned with the goods have become very widespread. Lease can actually be explained as the transferring of the right for the utilisation of a good that a person possesses for payment for a particular period of time. The particular transactions that are concerned with the Article 2 are the ones that will create a lease for a particular good and along with that a sublease for the good will also be created. Article 2 is usually applied to the lease rather than to the sale of the particular good. Article 2 A is a replication of the article 2 and it is different only when it has to reveal the difference that exists between the lease and the sales transactions.
There is no answer for this question