Answer:
Police powers allow states to
c) regulate private activities to promote public health, safety, and general welfare.
State governments are authorized body to regulate affairs within their territory. State regulatory powers are also referred to as police powers. The term constitutes the right to regulate private activities to promote public health, safety, and general welfare along with the enforcement of criminal law.
Answer:
The court will grant the request in case of following:
1. There is a probability of achievement on the facts;
2. There is the possibility for permanent damage;
3. There is the possibility of adverse impact on public;
4. Possible damage to the plaintiff offsets the probable damage to the defendant.
The name "taubmansucks.com" is only a presentation of Free Speech. There is no profitable motive. Hence, the website is secured through the help of First Amendment, and its usage cannot be charged.
The use by of names by Mishkoff is noncommercial. Since Mishkoff's use is noncommercial, Taubman cannot succeed on the evidences of his statement, and the court may not give any order against the usage of the shopsatwillowbend.com name.
Answer:
In provisions of the situation faced by plaintiffs in this situation covers under the principle of pre-emption in the supremacy clause of the Constitution. "Pre-emption take place when Congress, in passing a federal law, states a strong determination to pre-empt the law of state, once there is absolute or real clash between state and a federal.
This happens where obedience regarding state and federal act is in effect actually difficult, where there is implicit in federal law a barrier to state regulation, where Congress has enacted systematically, therefore inhabiting a whole field of guidelines and exiting no possibility for the supplement federal act.
Plaintiff's position in this case is the principle under constitution's supremacy clause. It occurs when congress is acting as federal statute, expresses a clear thought to what the state law states, where there is conflict between federal and state law, where compliance with both federal and state is impossible physically whew federal law is implicit barrier to state law.