expand icon
book Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 6th Edition by Jeffrey M Wooldridge cover

Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 6th Edition by Jeffrey M Wooldridge

Edition 6ISBN: 130527010X
book Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 6th Edition by Jeffrey M Wooldridge cover

Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 6th Edition by Jeffrey M Wooldridge

Edition 6ISBN: 130527010X
Exercise 4

Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let  Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define  Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   =G Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   as the OLS estimator of ?.

(i) Show that E( Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   X) =?.

(ii) Find Var( Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G.

(iii) Use Problem

Problem Let  Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let  Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z.

(i) Show that  Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   =A-1 Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   .

(ii) L et  Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that  Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   = Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare?

(iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for  Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   is  Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   A1(X?X)1A1?, where  Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X.

(iv) L et the  Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the  Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the  Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   and the  Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>

(v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se( Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   ) = se( Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   )/aj.

(vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for  Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   and  Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   are identical.

to verify that  Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   and the appropriate estimate of Var( Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1.

(iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?.

(v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),

 Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>

Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that  Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let   be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   =G   as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E(   X) =?. (ii) Find Var(   X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let   be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let   denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that   =A-1   . (ii) L et   be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that   =   , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for   is   A1(X?X)1A1?, where   is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the   be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the   be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the   and the   (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(   ) = se(   )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for   and   are identical. to verify that   and the appropriate estimate of Var(   X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),   Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>   and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can

formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters.

Step-by-step solution
Verified
like image
like image

Step 1 of 6

The model given is:

    <div class=answer> The model given is:   Satisfies Gauss-Markov assumptions, Let, G be a (k+1) x (k+1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix Define   , where <i>d</i> is a (k+1) x 1 vector Let   be the (k+1) x 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   as OLS estimator of <i>d</i>.

Satisfies Gauss-Markov assumptions,

Let, G be a (k+1) x (k+1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix

Define    <div class=answer> The model given is:   Satisfies Gauss-Markov assumptions, Let, G be a (k+1) x (k+1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix Define   , where <i>d</i> is a (k+1) x 1 vector Let   be the (k+1) x 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   as OLS estimator of <i>d</i>. , where d is a (k+1) x 1 vector

Let     <div class=answer> The model given is:   Satisfies Gauss-Markov assumptions, Let, G be a (k+1) x (k+1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix Define   , where <i>d</i> is a (k+1) x 1 vector Let   be the (k+1) x 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   as OLS estimator of <i>d</i>. be the (k+1) x 1 vector of OLS estimators and define     <div class=answer> The model given is:   Satisfies Gauss-Markov assumptions, Let, G be a (k+1) x (k+1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix Define   , where <i>d</i> is a (k+1) x 1 vector Let   be the (k+1) x 1 vector of OLS estimators and define   as OLS estimator of <i>d</i>. as OLS estimator of d.


Step 2 of 6


Step 3 of 6


Step 4 of 6


Step 5 of 6


Step 6 of 6

close menu
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 6th Edition by Jeffrey M Wooldridge
cross icon