
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 6th Edition by Jeffrey M Wooldridge
Edition 6ISBN: 130527010X
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach 6th Edition by Jeffrey M Wooldridge
Edition 6ISBN: 130527010XAssume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let
be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define
=G
as the OLS estimator of ?.
(i) Show that E(
X) =?.
(ii) Find Var(
X) in terms of ?2, X, and G.
(iii) Use Problem
Problem Let
be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let
denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z.
(i) Show that
=A-1
.
(ii) L et
be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that
=
, for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare?
(iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for
is
A1(X?X)1A1?, where
is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X.
(iv) L et the
be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the
be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the
and the
(v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se(
) = se(
)/aj.
(vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for
and
are identical.
to verify that
and the appropriate estimate of Var(
X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1.
(iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?.
(v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv),
Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that
and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can
formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters.
Step 1 of 6
The model given is:
Satisfies Gauss-Markov assumptions,
Let, G be a (k+1) x (k+1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix
Define
, where d is a (k+1) x 1 vector
Let
be the (k+1) x 1 vector of OLS estimators and define
as OLS estimator of d.
Step 2 of 6
Step 3 of 6
Step 4 of 6
Step 5 of 6
Step 6 of 6
Why don’t you like this exercise?
Other
X) =?.
X) in terms of ?2, X, and G.
be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let
denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z.
=A-1
.
be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that
=
, for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare?
is
A1(X?X)1A1?, where
is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X.
be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the
be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the
and the ![Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define =G as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E( X) =?. (ii) Find Var( X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that =A-1 . (ii) L et be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that = , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for is A1(X?X)1A1?, where is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the and the (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se( ) = se( )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for and are identical. to verify that and the appropriate estimate of Var( X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv), Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>](https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/SMCC2709/25e32da0_c00f_48b7_ad92_8bef5383b4dd_SMCC2709_11.jpg)
) = se(
)/aj.
and
are identical.
and the appropriate estimate of Var(
X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1.![Assume that the model y = X? + u satisfies the Gauss-Markov assumptions, let G be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular, nonrandom matrix, and define ? =G?, so that ? is also a (k + 1) × 1 vector. Let be the (k + 1) × 1 vector of OLS estimators and define =G as the OLS estimator of ?. <blockquote> (i) Show that E( X) =?. (ii) Find Var( X) in terms of ?2, X, and G. (iii) Use Problem Problem Let be the OLS estimate from the regression of y on X. Let A be a (k + 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix and define zt = xtA, t = 1,….,n. Therefore, zt is 1 × (k + 1) and is a nonsingular linear combination of xt. Let Z be the n × (k + 1) matrix with rows zt. Let denote the OLS estimate from a regression of y on Z. <blockquote> (i) Show that =A-1 . (ii) L et be the fitted values from the original regression and let . y t be the fitted values from regressing y on Z. Show that = , for all t =- 1, 2,…., n. How do the residuals from the two regressions compare? (iii) Show that the estimated variance matrix for is A1(X?X)1A1?, where is the usual variance estimate from regressing y on X. (iv) L et the be the OLS estimates from regressing yt on 1, xt1,...,xtk, and let the be the OLS estimates from the regression of yt on 1, a1xt1,…,ak xtk, where aj ? 0, j =1,…,k. Use the results from part (i) to find the relationship between the and the (v) Assuming the setup of part (iv), use part (iii) to show that se( ) = se( )/aj. (vi) Assuming the setup of part (iv), show that the absolute values of the t statistics for and are identical. to verify that and the appropriate estimate of Var( X) are obtained from the regression of y on XG1. </blockquote> (iv) Now, let c be a (k +1) × 1 vector with at least one nonzero entry. For concreteness, assume that ck ? 0. Define ?=c??, so that ? is a scalar. Define ?j=?j, j =1, ...,k 1 and ?k = 0. Show how to define a (k+ 1) × (k + 1) nonsingular matrix G so that ? =G?. (v) Show that for the choice of G in part (iv), Use this expression for G1 and part (iii) to conclude that and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can formally justify the trick we use throughout the text for obtaining the standard error of a linear combination of parameters. </blockquote>](https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/SMCC2709/8be50db4_98bb_4638_b48f_6daa436512b4_SMCC2709_11.jpg)
and its standard error are obtained as the coefficient on xtk /ck in the regression of yt on [1 (c0/ck)xtk], [xt1 (c1/ck)xtk],..., [xt,k1 (ck1/ck)xtk], xtk/ck, t = 1,...,n. This regression is exactly the one obtained by writing ?k in terms of ? and ?0, ?1,...,?k1, plugging the result into the original model, and rearranging. Therefore, we can
