The primary argument against reductionism is that
A)using multiple levels of analysis makes understanding needlessly complex.
B)phenomena may only be understandable at specific levels of analysis.
C)it is impossible to identify the best level of analysis for some phenomena.
D)theoretical biases make it difficult to adjust levels of analysis.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The primary argument against reductionism is that phenomena may only be understandable at specific levels of analysis. Reductionism assumes that complex systems can be fully understood by breaking them down into their component parts, but this may not always be the case. Some phenomena may only be understandable at specific levels of analysis, and attempting to reduce them further may result in an incomplete or inaccurate understanding.

The Primary Argument Against Reductionism Is That