Predictive validation is a better measure of validity than concurrent validation because:
A) job applicants tend to be more motivated to do well on the tests.
B) job applicants' performance on the tests is not influenced by their firsthand experience with the job.
C) the group studied is more likely to include people who perform poorly on the test,a necessary ingredient to accurately validate a test.
D) "job applicants tend to be more motivated to do well on the tests," "job applicants" performance on the tests is not influenced by their firsthand experience with the job," and "the group studied is more likely to include people who perform poorly on the test,a necessary ingredient to accurately validate a test."
E) only "job applicants tend to be more motivated to do well on the tests" and "job applicants" performance on the tests is not influenced by their firsthand experience with the job."

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Predictive validation is a better measure of validity than concurrent validation because it addresses the shortcomings of concurrent validation. The shortcomings of concurrent validation are: job applicants tend to be more motivated to do well on the tests, job applicants' performance on the tests is influenced by their firsthand experience with the job, and the group studied may not include people who perform poorly on the test. Predictive validation, on the other hand, addresses these shortcomings by testing job applicants before they are hired, ensuring that their performance on the tests is not influenced by firsthand experience with the job, and allowing for a wider range of scores to accurately validate the test. Therefore, choice D is the correct answer.

Predictive Validation Is a Better Measure of Validity Than Concurrent