A written agreement was signed by two parties and it was intended to be their entire agreement.The parol evidence rule will prevent the admission of evidence that is offered to:
A) prove the existence of a contemporaneous oral agreement that modifies the contract.
B) prove the existence of a subsequent oral agreement that modifies the contract.
C) explain the meaning of an ambiguity in the written contract.
D) establish that fraud had been committed in the formation of the contract.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q50: Whose signatures are needed in order to
Q52: Bruce told Adam that he was selling
Q56: The Uniform Commercial Code changed the traditional
Q59: The marriage provision in the statute of
Q60: The "confirmatory memorandum" exception to the UCC's
Q62: Davis owes a $5 million debt to
Q63: Jones goes to a clothing store and
Q64: A merger clause is also known as
Q74: Subsequent agreements are treated in what way
Q83: Arnold promised to sell his car to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents