According to the text, when police use lineup procedures to obtain identifications of criminals from eyewitnesses, which is better, the match-to-suspect approach or the match-to-culprit approach?
A) The match-to-suspect approach-because it does not "burn" eyewitnesses as much.
B) The match-to-suspect approach-because it is less likely to "lead" suspects.
C) The match-to-culprit approach-because it does not "burn" eyewitnesses as much.
D) The match-to-culprit approach-because it is less likely to "lead" suspects.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The text states that the match-to-culprit approach is better because it is less likely to "lead" suspects. It also notes that the match-to-suspect approach can result in eyewitnesses feeling "burned" if they pick the wrong person, whereas the match-to-culprit approach minimizes this risk.

According to the Text, When Police Use Lineup Procedures to Obtain