In NBN Broadcasting,Inc.v.Sheridan Broadcasting Networks,Inc.the court held that:
A)the trial court's judgment was proper because NBN's complaint essentially requested relitigation of the issues the court already decided.
B)the trial court should not have addressed claims that were barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
C)the trial court's judgment was erroneous because none of NBN's claims were previously litigated,thus,not subject to the doctrine of res judicata.
D)the trial court improperly dismissed all of NBN's claims on the basis of res judicata because NBN asserted new,subsequent claims.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court held that the res judicata effect is limited to those claims that had arisen at the time that NBN brought the State Court action.They did not include the relocation of the New York Office,which had not yet even been brought to an initial vote.There was no submission to the State Court of NBN's equal right to decide whether the New York Office should be moved from its existing location as part of NBN's premises.

In NBN Broadcasting,Inc.v.Sheridan Broadcasting Networks,Inc.the Court Held That