In MP Nexlevel of Cal. ,Inc.v.CVIN,the case in the text,the court held that:
A)CVIN and CENIC were in a legal partnership because they filed a joint application for grant funding.
B)CVIN and CENIC were not in a legal partnership.
C)CVIN and CENIC were in a legal partnership because they represented on grant forms that they were in a "public-private partnership."
D)CVIN and CENIC were in a legal partnership because they jointly built,operated,and maintained the project.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court held that based on the facts before it,CVIN and CENIC were not in a legal partnership.Further,even if a partnership existed,MP failed to show that it reasonably relied on the belief that CVIN and CENIC were partners when MP entered into the contracts.