Dart Corp.dismissed Ritz as its general sales agent and hired Parker as its new general sales agent.Parker provided notice to Bing Corp. ,a retail outlet,that he was taking over as general sales agent and Bing was no longer authorized to make sales for Dart Corp.Ritz subsequently sold Bing Corp.goods to be delivered by Dart Corp.and accepted a standard 20 percent cash deposit for the sale of goods,which is common in the industry. In an action by Bing against Dart on the sales contract,which of the following is true?
A) Bing will win the lawsuit because Dart's notice was inadequate to terminate Ritz's apparent authority.
B) Dart will win the lawsuit because Dart's new agent provided notice to Bing that Ritz is no longer Dart's agent.
C) Bing will lose the lawsuit,because Ritz lacked any express or implied authority to make the contract.
D) Bing will lose the lawsuit because Bing was negligent while making a contract with Ritz.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q51: When does an agent expressly bind herself
Q52: In which of the following cases is
Q54: Cyrano hired Roxanne to purchase a yacht.Cyrano
Q55: Respondeat superior makes a principal liable for
Q56: When a principal is liable for an
Q58: What is the nature of the principal
Q59: An agent is not liable for making
Q60: Kin is an agent for a disclosed
Q61: What is a nondelegable duty?
A)A duty of
Q62: What is an employer's liability based on
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents