In the text case AT&T Mobility LLC v.Concepcion,why did the U.S.Supreme Court majority believe that the case was subject to arbitration?
A)Disputes involving such nominal amounts,such as the $30.22 the plaintiffs claimed,are better suited for arbitration.
B)Contract provisions requiring arbitration of claims on an individual basis are both permissible and enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act,which takes priority over any conflicting state law.
C)The applicable state law and the Federal Arbitration Act required the plaintiffs arbitrate their claims,despite any provision stated in the contract.
D)The plaintiffs' claim did not meet joinder requirements to join the class action.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The U.S.Supreme Court held that contract provisions requiring arbitration of claims on an individual basis-and prohibiting joinder of those claims with others in a class action-type arbitration-are both permissible and enforceable under the FAA,notwithstanding any state law to the contrary.

In the Text Case AT&T Mobility LLC V