Alan entered into a written contract for the purchase of a house owned by Joe.But as the time to move approached,Alan discovered that Joe was refusing to move out and refusing to transfer the property.Apparently a dissatisfied customer had driven through the showroom window of Joe's new car dealership,causing him considerable expense.Joe could no longer afford to purchase the new luxury home in Langley to which he had intended to move.Which of the following is the appropriate remedy in these circumstances for Alan,who really wants the house?
A) specific performance
B) damages
C) injunction
D) no remedy
E) rescission

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Specific performance is a legal remedy that compels a party to perform its obligations under a contract. In this case, Alan can seek a court order requiring Joe to transfer the property to him as per the terms of the contract. Damages may not be an appropriate remedy in this case as the main goal of Alan is to obtain the house, not monetary compensation. Injunction may not be applicable either as it is a court order that requires a party to stop doing something. Rescission may be an option, but it would mean cancelling the contract altogether, which Alan may not want if he is still interested in buying the house. Therefore, specific performance is the best choice for Alan to obtain the house he contracted to purchase.

Alan Entered into a Written Contract for the Purchase of a House