Joe was a contractor and hired subtrades to help build his houses.Sam was a framer and had agreed to frame four houses for Joe for a set price.Joe was to supply the materials.After two houses were completed,Joe's suppliers increased the cost of lumber,and Joe told Sam that he could no longer pay him the amount that they'd agreed.Sam agreed to take 15 percent less for the other two jobs,which were then completed.During this time,regular payments were made from Joe to Sam,but the total amount received was 15 percent lower than the originally agreed on price for the last two jobs.Sam sued Joe for the original contract price,claiming that he'd received no consideration for his agreement to take less for the last two jobs.Explain what defences may be available to Joe under these circumstances and his likelihood of success.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q162: Discuss the requirement of consideration and its
Q164: Discuss the requirement of consensus in the
Q167: Joe drove his car into Sam's garage
Q168: Joe owed Sam $500. Two days after
Q171: Discuss the requirements for a valid offer,
Q173: Joe, a university student, parked his car
Q179: Discuss the "freedom of contract," explaining what
Q180: Joe owed Sam $500. Two days before
Q181: Explain the principle of promissory estoppel and
Q184: Explain any limitations on the availability of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents