When he begins deliberating with fellow jurors, DeAndre is convinced of the defendant's guilt. As he listens attentively, he rethinks his own position in order to evaluate the evidence from the perspective of innocence. This point-counterpoint method of deliberation is an example of:
A) justification of effort.
B) factor analysis.
C) dialectical reasoning.
D) contextual intelligence.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The point-counterpoint method of deliberation, where DeAndre is challenging his initial beliefs and considering the evidence from both perspectives, is an example of dialectical reasoning. This involves examining and synthesizing opposing arguments in order to arrive at a more nuanced understanding of a situation.

When He Begins Deliberating with Fellow Jurors, DeAndre Is Convinced