Cilus and Shane are playing an ultimatum game where Cilus is given $50 and asked to propose a way of splitting it with Shane.When Shane learns Cilus's proposal,Shane chooses whether to accept or reject the split.If Shane accepts the split,both players receive the money according to Cilus's split proposal.If Shane rejects the split,both players receive nothing.This game will be played only once,so Cilus does not have to worry about reciprocity when making his choice.Assume that split proposals can be made only in increments of $1.
According to traditional economic theory,which presumes both players are fully rational and wish to maximize their incomes,what is the outcome of the game? Why is this outcome not observed very often in experimental settings?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q62: Which of the following is an example
Q116: If two duopolists arrive at the Nash
Q117: In January 2011,Coca-Cola and Pepsi agreed to
Q118: Game theorist Robert Axelrod decided to examine
Q119: The accompanying matrix depicts two firms in
Q122: The accompanying payoff matrix depicts the possible
Q123: Suppose that,in an experimental setting,100 students are
Q124: Player A and Player B are playing
Q125: The accompanying payoff matrix depicts the possible
Q126: The accompanying payoff matrix depicts the possible
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents