A military institute in a particular state launched a separate program for women.However,the senior members of the program held that women would not be provided with the same type of rigorous military training,facilities,courses,faculty,financial opportunities,and alumni connections that were provided to male cadets.The women cadets of the program filed a suit in order to get justice.Which of the following approaches is most likely to be adopted in this case?
A) minimum rationality approach
B) strict scrutiny approach
C) quasi-strict scrutiny approach
D) indeterminate scrutiny approach
E) rational basis approach

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The quasi-strict scrutiny approach is most likely to be adopted in this case. A few cases use quasi-strict scrutiny tests because the classifications are only partially suspect or the rights involved are not quite fundamental. Classifications directed at gender are partially suspect. Therefore, the gender discrimination faced by the women candidates can be solved by adopting the quasi-strict scrutiny approach.

A Military Institute in a Particular State Launched a Separate