Why was the plaintiff builder successful in the case of Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (1987) 162 CLR 221?
A) The work was completed with proper skill and on time.
B) The defendant had repudiated the contract.
C) The defendant had received a benefit from the builder's performance of the contract.
D) The contract was entire and not divisible.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: The main purpose of damages is to
Q7: What is the purpose of rescission?
Q8: What are some advantages for seeking rescission
Q9: Which of the following statements is the
Q10: Which of the following statements is the
Q12: Restitution is not a common law remedy.
Q13: Which of the following is NOT one
Q14: The right to rescind a contract may
Q15: Which of the following statements is the
Q16: To effectively enforce contractual rights,the injured party
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents