Why was the plaintiff bound by the exclusion clause in the case of: L'Estrange v Graucob Ltd [1934] 2 KB 394?
A)Because the clause applied to the damage that occurred.
B)Because the clause was explained to them.
C)Because the clause was contained in a written document signed by the plaintiff.
D)Because of previous dealings between the parties.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The plaintiff was bound by the exclusion clause because it was contained in a written document that the plaintiff had signed. The court held that by signing the document, the plaintiff had agreed to be bound by its terms, including the exclusion clause. The fact that the plaintiff had not read or understood the clause was not relevant, as the law assumes that parties who sign written agreements are bound by their terms.

Why Was the Plaintiff Bound by the Exclusion Clause in the Case