Why was the plaintiff unsuccessful in the case of Poussard v Spiers & Bond [1876] 1 QBD 410?
A) The term was an innominate term,and the breach was not serious enough to entitle the other party to repudiate.
B) The term which had been breached was a warranty because it was subsidiary to the main purpose of the contract.
C) The term which had been breached was a condition because the breach had a serious effect on the contract.
D) The term which had been breached was a condition because the term was essential to the contract and the other party would not have entered into the contract without it.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: Which of the following is NOT an
Q23: When there is a breach of a
Q24: Why was the plaintiff successful in the
Q25: Why did the court imply a term
Q26: Why was the dry cleaning company held
Q28: Define a condition and a warranty,and identify
Q29: Which of the following is NOT one
Q30: If a contract contains uncertain or meaningless
Q31: A term in a contract which relieves
Q32: In which of the following cases did
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents