In Scheerer v. Fisher where Scheerer, a real estate agent, sued Fisher for failing to pay Scheerer for his services in locating property for Fisher, the appeals court held that:
A) Scheerer had a case for quantum meruit recovery
B) Scheerer did not have a case for quantum meruit recovery
C) Scheerer had a case for special performance
D) Scheerer did not have a case for just compensation
E) none of the other choices are correct

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The appeals court held that Scheerer had a case for quantum meruit recovery, which is a type of implied contract where one party is entitled to recover the reasonable value of services or goods provided to another party, even if there was no written agreement or formal contract. In this case, Scheerer had located property for Fisher and was entitled to be compensated for his services.

In Scheerer V