In DCS Sanitary Management v. Castillo, where a company had employees agree not to work for any competitors within 100 miles of any customer of DCS, the appeals court held that the agreement:
A) was a valid restraint on competition since such agreements are legal unless they violate the antitrust laws
B) violated public policy and that the company must pay damages to the employees
C) was not enforceable due to lack of consideration
D) was a reasonable restraint on competition that could be enforced
E) none of the other choices

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In DCS Sanitary Management v. Castillo, where a company had employees agree not to work for any competitors within 100 miles of any customer of DCS, the appeals court held that the agreement:
A) was a valid restraint on competition since such agreements are legal unless they violate the antitrust laws
B) violated public policy and that the company must pay damages to the employees
C) was not enforceable due to lack of consideration
D) was a reasonable restraint on competition that could be enforced
E) none of the other choices

In DCS Sanitary Management V