Give correct response. In Allen v. Whitehead, the defendant, an occupier and licensee of a refreshment house employed a manager for running the refreshment house. He used to visit it only once or twice a week. He had given express instructions to the manager that no prostitutes were to be allowed to congregate on the premises of the house. The manager, inspite of his instructions to the contrary, allowed some women, whom he knew to be prostitutes, to congregate on the premises. The defendant had no personal knowledge of it. Held that:
A) The defendant was not liable but the manger was liable because the defendant had given express instructions to the manger not to allow prostitutes to congregate on his premises.
B) The defendant was not liable for the offence of allowing prostitutes to congregate on his premises because he had no knowledge about it.
C) The defendant was held vicariously liable for knowingly suffering prostitutes to meet and remain in the refreshment house.
D) None of the above answers is correct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q79: Give best response. Actus non facit reum
Q80: Give correct response. Negligence in crime means
Q81: Give best response. The liability to conviction
Q82: Give correct response. A Football pool promoter
Q83: Give best response. Vicarious liability means :
A)Liability
Q85: Give best response about the justification of
Q86: The word 'takes' in Section 361 of
Q87: Which one of the following is an
Q88: Which is an instance of criminal attempt?
A)A
Q89: Defamation is related with:
A)Character of a person
B)Reputation
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents