Jackson v. Bishop held the criteria of "broad and idealistic concepts of dignity, civilized standards, humanity, and decency are useful and usable" and gave nine reasons to eliminate whipping.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Jackson v. Bishop, the court indeed held that broad and idealistic concepts such as dignity, civilized standards, humanity, and decency are not only useful but also usable in evaluating the constitutionality of corporal punishment, specifically whipping, in prisons. The court provided nine reasons to eliminate whipping, emphasizing the importance of these concepts in the decision.

Jackson V Bishop Held the Criteria of "Broad and Idealistic Concepts