In which of the following cases was the claimant not able to recover damages due to the privity rule?
A) Jackson v Horizon Holidays
B) Woodar Investment v Wimpey
C) Linden Gardens v Lenesta
D) Lloyds v Harper
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q34: Does the implication of terms into contract
Q35: The doctrine of privity means that:
A) Only
Q36: Which case is seen as establishing the
Q37: How did Mrs Beswick get round the
Q38: What is the effect of the Contracts
Q40: In which case was a collateral contract
Q41: Anna lets her flat to Brian with
Q42: Liar Ltd a manufacturer of shaving products,
Q43: The case of Shanklin Pier v Detel
Q44: in Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents