In arguing against propositions of policy, it is usually wisest for the opponent to argue against both the reason for change and the consequences of change.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

It is usually more effective for the opponent to argue against both the reason for change and the consequences of change, as this allows them to address multiple aspects of the proposition and weaken the overall argument in favor of change.

In Arguing Against Propositions of Policy, It Is Usually Wisest