Why would intelligent design not be considered a scientific explanation for the origin of living things?
A) It is not a testable strategy.
B) It is not a testable hypothesis.
C) It is not a testable experiment.
D) It is not a testable theory.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: Why were Darwin's ideas so widely accepted
Q24: What aspect of the geology of the
Q25: What is the role of fossils in
Q26: In land mammals, the pelvic girdle is
Q27: Which event would most likely result in
Q29: True or false: Special creation could be
Q30: The standard classification system used by biologists
Q31: You discover a primate fossil while on
Q32: Using Darwin's inferences, which population would be
Q33: Humans who have mutations in the presenilin
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents