Herbert is studying the risk factors associated with heart diseases. He identified three risk factors (age, sex, and cholesterol level) , and built two different models.
Model 1: Logit(Yi) = -7 + 2.5X1 - X2. -2LL = 3
Model 2: Logit(Yi) = -8.5 + 1.5X3 -2LL = 8
Y: 1= diagnosed with major heart disease; 0 = no major heart disease;
X1: age in years (above 40) ;
X2: sex, where 0 is male and 1 is female;
X3: cholesterol level (in mmol/L)
Herbert conducted a log likelihood difference test (p = .025) and concluded that Model 1 fit the data significantly better than Model 2. Evaluate his analysis.
A) The analysis is not valid. The two models cannot be compared using the log likelihood difference test because they are not nested models.
B) The interpretation of the test results is erroneous. The fact that the null hypothesis is rejected indicates that Model 2 fit the data better than Model 1.
C) The interpretation of the test results is erroneous. The fact that null hypothesis is rejected indicates that Model 1 and Model 2 do not differ substantially in fit.
D) There is nothing wrong with the analysis.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: A study was conducted to investigate variables
Q11: A study was conducted to investigate variables
Q12: In logistic regression, which of the following
Q13: Aaron is studying smoking behavior and has
Q14: For a logistic regression model, if −2LL
Q16: If the logistic regression model is a
Q17: In logistic regression, the multiple R2 pseudovariance
Q18: Aaron is studying smoking behavior and has
Q19: In the smoking study, Aaron has obtained
Q20: In the smoking study, Aaron has obtained
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents