Beauchamp and Childress reject the use of the casuistical method and of analogy in moral reasoning.

Name: Beauchamp and Childress reject the use of the casuistical method and of analogy in moral reasoning.
Brand: Quizplus
Rating: 4.9 (38 reviews)

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Beauchamp and Childress, in their work on biomedical ethics, actually incorporate the use of casuistry and analogy as part of their methodological approach to address complex ethical issues, recognizing the value of case-based reasoning in moral deliberation.

Beauchamp and Childress Reject the Use of the Casuistical Method